| Keyword | CPC | PCC | Volume | Score | Length of keyword |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sarla mudgal case upsc | 1.9 | 0.8 | 8832 | 63 | 22 |
| sarla | 1.04 | 0.1 | 736 | 58 | 5 |
| mudgal | 1.76 | 0.7 | 9585 | 40 | 6 |
| case | 0.87 | 0.1 | 2814 | 58 | 4 |
| upsc | 1.82 | 0.2 | 651 | 98 | 4 |
| Keyword | CPC | PCC | Volume | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| sarla mudgal case upsc | 1.57 | 0.4 | 5709 | 67 |
| sarla mudgal case brief | 0.93 | 0.7 | 8626 | 96 |
| sarla mudgal case study | 1.63 | 0.1 | 6877 | 70 |
| sarla mudgal case 1995 | 0.36 | 0.4 | 3182 | 13 |
| sarla mudgal case summary | 1.78 | 0.8 | 7420 | 52 |
| sarla mudgal case citation | 0.05 | 0.4 | 8919 | 34 |
| sarla mudgal v union of india | 0.51 | 0.9 | 4373 | 77 |
| sarla mudgal vs union of india | 1.78 | 0.7 | 524 | 87 |
| sarla mudgal v uoi | 1.24 | 0.6 | 4406 | 23 |
| shreya singhal case upsc | 0.61 | 0.5 | 3844 | 57 |
| sarla mudgal vs state of haryana | 0.53 | 0.4 | 7876 | 60 |
| sarla mudgal vs union of india summary | 0.51 | 0.1 | 2466 | 23 |
| sarla mudgal vs union of india judgement | 0.34 | 0.8 | 7533 | 57 |
| important cases for upsc | 1.36 | 0.3 | 3923 | 77 |
| sarla mudgal vs union of india citation | 0.45 | 0.7 | 4242 | 53 |
| shirur mutt case upsc | 0.1 | 0.1 | 675 | 74 |
This issue was scrutinized by the Supreme Court at length in the landmark case of Sarla Mudgal & Ors. v. Union of Indi a and it settled the ambiguity surrounding the rights, duties and obligations of people who change religion to defeat the law.
Is the judgment of Sarla Mudgal a violation of freedom of conscience?The court held that the contention of the petitioner that the judgment of Sarla Mudgal amounts to the violation of freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion as guaranteed under Article 25 and 26 of the Constitution, is far fetched and is alleged by those who hide behind the cloak of religion to escape the law.
Can UCC be implemented in India?UCC can be implemented only when there is harmony among religions. The case is popular as the Sarla Mudgal case. The judgment is appreciable and landmark in matrimonal aspects in India, as it gave a positive approach to the concept of apostasy and bigamy by providing a new dimension to expression ‘void’ under section 494 of IPC.
